芭芭拉

HD

主演:马修·阿马立克,让娜·巴利巴尔

类型:电影地区:法国语言:法语年份:2017

欢迎安装高清版[一起看]电影APP

 无尽

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 红牛

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 剧照

芭芭拉 剧照 NO.1芭芭拉 剧照 NO.2芭芭拉 剧照 NO.3芭芭拉 剧照 NO.4芭芭拉 剧照 NO.5芭芭拉 剧照 NO.6芭芭拉 剧照 NO.13芭芭拉 剧照 NO.14芭芭拉 剧照 NO.15芭芭拉 剧照 NO.16芭芭拉 剧照 NO.17芭芭拉 剧照 NO.18芭芭拉 剧照 NO.19芭芭拉 剧照 NO.20

 剧情介绍

芭芭拉电影免费高清在线观看全集。
  布丽吉特(珍妮·巴利巴尔 Jeanne Balibar 饰)是一名非常敬业的女演员,一次,她得到了一个角色,扮演一位名叫芭芭拉的法国女歌手,她的身世非常的传奇,是法国国民级的天后,为了扮演好这一角色,布丽吉特一头扎进了漫无边际的关于芭芭拉的资料里。除了外形上的相似,布丽吉特开始改变自己的个性,从看人的眼神,说话的语气,走路的姿态,布丽吉特一点一点的将自己改造成为了芭芭拉的模样。 英语老师敌对分子使命营救剧场版 中二病也要谈恋爱! -Take On Me-白银帝国弗兰妮·克鲁恐怖集美国战队:世界警察奇葩大会 第二季gdgd妖精s特工妈咪幻影计划家在树德坊三个老爸的护花之旅第一季变脸丈夫心脏信号2史上最强男主角玛雅帮 第五季叶问4:完结篇(粤语版)耶稣革命闪婚幸运草的命中注定猫头鹰的哭泣乡村牧师日记DOG DAYS第二季相依为命宝乐婶的烦心事瘟神系列:破门黑钱胜地第一季第48届全美音乐大奖颁奖典礼爱情手册2灰色的果实实习医生格蕾 第六季菜刀班尖刀连潘多拉的果实~科学犯罪搜查档案~ 第一季星条旗永不落以诺的冰雪奇缘雌雄双谍魔鬼山历险记2009国语购物惊魂记幻象

 长篇影评

 1 ) 【作业】比较《别人的生活》《丽塔》和《芭芭拉》中的东德。

匆忙写的,没有edit,,有语法问题或拼写错误请见谅。 The Legend of Rita (German title: die Stille nach dem Schuss) is a German film, released in 2000, directed by Volker Schlöndorff. The film tells the story of Rita Vogt, a member of the extreme left-wing terrorist group, Red Army Faktion (RAF). She is responsible for bank robbery, breaking into a prison to rescue her partner and killing a policeman when she is in exile in France. She then finds her place in East German, where she is provided with a new identity by the Stasi. Rita decides to stay in East Germany although her partners decide to leave because she believes East Germany is the country where her political ideal is fulfilled. Barbara was released in 2012, directed by Christian Petzold. In the 62nd Berlin International Film Festival in 2012, where Christian Petzold was awarded the Silver Bear for the Best Director. The protagonist, Barbara Wolff, is a doctor who used to work at The Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, the oldest and most prominent hospital in East Berlin. She is transferred, in fact, demoted, to a clinic in a small village in Northern East Germany and makes the Stasi watch list, because she expressed her wish to go to the West. In the village, she meets Andre, a doctor at the clinic she works at. He is supposed to watch Barbara and report her activities to the Stasi agent in the village. Also, she meets Stella, a girl who was detained at the Torgau Juvenile Workhouse for an unknown reason, Barbara’s former patient, for whom Barbara sacrifices her opportunity to run away to the West. The Legend of Rita and Barbara are both post-reunification German films about the former German Democratic Republic (GDR) and they both attempt to challenge the conventional west-centric discourse of the memory of the GDR in media with different approaches. East Germany is also stereotypically presented as simply Stasiland, with no freedom of speech, failed political system, economically and socially backward. Even though Schlöndorff tried to avoid the conventional West-triumph-over-east narrative, the Legend of Rita still taps into many East German stereotypes. On the other hand, Barbara reconstructs a more realistic GDR in colour and presents a more complex set of characters in the former socialist state. The Stasi is commonly seen as the dominant ruling power over the East German people. The East German people are simply seen as the victims of the state apparatus. The most well-known film about former East Germany is the Lives of Others, directed by Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck. The film won the 2006 Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. It also had won numerous awards elsewhere, including Deutscher Filmpreis for the best film, best director, best screenplay, best actor, and best supporting actor. The Lives of the Others sets paradigm of the public discourse of the former GDR. It is so successful because the film reconstructs former East Germany as a dark oppressive country in which people have no freedom of speech. The streets seem dark and grey. Donnersmarck uses an extra-diegetic soundtrack frequently to create the oppressive and unpleasant environment of GDR and guide the thought of the audience further into seeing the GDR as the oppressive force over the population. The Lives of the Others harshly criticize the former East German socialist regime and clearly demonstrate the simplistic binary of the state as the perpetrator and the free-loving people as the victim. Additionally, the narrative of the Lives of the Others exudes optimism towards the reunification in 1989. (Cooke 2011) The end of the socialist regime marks the liberation of people, including the artists. Dreyman’s new play featuring an African-German actress marks progress in anti-racism. The Lives of the Others emphasizes the Stasi as the powerful tool of the state machine overseeing and controlling the people all the time. Their networks are ubiquitous in East German society and the people do not have any chance to resist. Every step taken in East Germany is observed by the Stasi. If anyone shows any signs of faithlessness to the state, he or she will be punished immediately. The Stasi is the ruthless and effective enforcer of the will of the state (Moeller and Lellis 2012). The Legend of Rita and Barbara tackles the popular negative discourse of GDR history not by denying the brutality of the Stasi but by highlighting not only the oppression of the state apparatus but also the revolutionary political ideal and a place where love is possible in spite of the state oppression (Pinfold 2014). Although, West Germany is presented as the Promised Land in the Lives of the Others, Rita and Barbara, eventually willingly surrender their opportunity to live in West Germany. West German society is not at the centre of the stage in either the Legend of Rita or Barbara, however, both films allude to some facts of West German society. In the Legend of Rita, Rita’s first of three stories take place in West Germany and in Barbara, the interaction between East and West can be seen through Barbara’s West German boyfriend and his business partner. Barbara’s boyfriend, Jörg, is a businessman from West Germany, who frequently travels across the border with his business partner. He and his partner come into East Germany with their Mercedes, nice suits and ties, which distinguish them from the local East Germans, who drive Trabis and have to wait for years after they order it. He comes to the East to visit Barbara twice in the film. During the first visit, when Barbara and her boyfriend are meeting in the wood, the business partner of her boyfriend, Gerhard has a conversation with a local East German. The local man shows curiosity about the Mercedes and that indicates the lack of variety and poor quality of East German cars. Later when Barbara’s boyfriend returns to the car, Gerhard imitates the East German in a sarcastic voice: “is that a Mercedes, how much do they cost, how long did you have to wait, we waited eight years for ours and that wasn’t bad” and ask Barbara’s boyfriend: “was is it at least worth it?” This scene shows that the West German feel they are superior to the East because of the economic development. In spite of its poor performance and quality, the Trabant, produced by VEB Sachsenring Automobilwerke Zwickau in Zwickau, Saxony, is a distinctive symbol of the extinct former GDR. Various models of Trabants in different colours are collected in a Trabi museum in Berlin 25 metres away from Checkpoint Charlie. In Dresden, people today can experience relive the life of a former East German by driving a Trabant themselves. The Trabant is indeed the people’s car in East Germany. The Trabant incorporate more cultural and political nuance in the Legend of Rita in the context of Ostalgie. Rita spends the last of her West Deutschmark on a Trabant as part of her integration process into East German society. The second rendezvous between Barbara and her boyfriend took place in a hotel. Barbara sneaks into the hotel room from the window, where they stay and discuss their future. In the hotel room, they hear exaggerated sex noise from Gerhard’s room. Her boy explains that Gerhard has met a girl, Steffi, and he said he loves her. Barbara points out the nature of their relationship immediately: “Because she can’t follow him.” She meets Steffi when her boyfriend and Gerhard go out to attend a meeting in the restaurant. She says to Barbara: Steffi: “If he marries me, do you think they’ll let me leave?” Barbara: “I don’t think so.” Steffi: “Do you know your stuff about this?” Conversation implies that Steffi is unaware of the nature of her relationship with Gerhard. Gerhard used presents in exchange for sex with Steffi. To Barbara, the romantic connection does not exist between Steffi and Gerhard. The relationship between them is simply a trade between sexual intercourse and presents. Yet, Gerhard is not completely honest in this relationship. He claims that he loves Steffi and that makes Steffi dream about one day Gerhard will marry her and take her out of the GDR. It is unlikely he genuinely falls for an East German girl because he talks about the East with contempt when Jörg comes back from his meeting with Barbara in the wood recently. Steffi is amazed by the variety of jewelry in the catalogue, which is unavailable in East Germany at that time. Thus, Gerhard, a businessman from the West, has the chance to exploit the gullibility of the young East German girl and the lack of variety of goods in East Germany. During Barbara’s conversation with Steffi, she looks reluctant while Steffi shows her the catalogue with ostensible excitement on her face. Capitalist consumerism is not what she wants in her life. Moreover, just before Jörg leaves for the meeting, he proposes “what Petzold regards the key sentence of the whole film”: Jörg: “Once you’ve come over, you’ll be able to sleep late.” Barbara: “Why is that?” Jörg: “I earn enough, you won’t need to work.” The conversation between Jörg and Barbara is important in the narrative of the film is because it makes Barbara reconsider her wish to go to the West. She realizes that going to the West may mark the end of the medical career to which she devotes herself and is her identity. Barbara had an accomplished and fulfilling career in East Germany. Although she is reassigned to a small clinic, she once worked at the famous Charité hospital in Berlin. Consumerism, fear for change in her professional life and the growing affection toward Andre contribute to her decision to stay in East Germany at the end of the film. Petzold uses Chic’s At Last, I’m Free as the ending theme of the film. The connotation of the song is open to different interpretations; it could possibly mean that Stella finally escapes, or a more likely explanation would be Barbara has the freedom to choose where she lives of her own will. Schlöndorff, in The Legend of Rita, also addresses the freedom of choice and at the same time justifies people’s resentment to the government in the East and why Rita is more motivated to be a good East German citizen than her peer at the factory. In the scene Rita and Tatjana having a conversation after work by the window, Tatjana asks Rita: Tatjana: “Don’t you regret coming here?” Rita: “I’ve always been left politically. I didn’t have a lot of options. I used to be a waitress.” Tatjana: “Funny, you come here voluntarily and I want nothing more than to get away.” Rita: “This is how it is, here and there.” Tatjana: “I’d like to see that with my own eyes. Maybe I’d even come back, then I’d be here on my own will.” This conversation indicates that people in East Germany do not have the liberty to have their own political opinions, but it also implies that the western system is not necessarily superior to the socialist model in East Germany. Freedom is not simply moving to the West or the West annexing the East, but the ability to make choices. Schlöndorff dealt with the political issue between East and West with a great amount of political sensitivity. He challenges the image of the former GDR as a failed political experiment but as a socialist utopia. A Strong anti-capitalist message is delivered in the Legend of Rita. Schlöndorff intends to upset the accustomed view of the GDR as a failed political system and question the commonly accepted western system that triumphs over the East. Rita herself is left-wing political. Unlike Andreas Baader in the film the Baader-Meinhof Complex, who appears a violent egocentric extremist, Rita is well aware of the political motivation behind her radical actions in West Germany. At the beginning of the film, Rita’s monologue states that her intention is to abolish injustice as well as the government. Politics were war throughout the world. She has Karl Marx’s bust and books of iconic revolutionary figures, such as Ho Chi Minh and Che Guevara. Moreover, she is more anti-capitalist than pro-violence. This is demonstrated in the scene she has a heated debate with her partners when they are in exile in France. Although she shot the policemen who pursue her in France, she did that involuntarily because she was trapped in the underground parking lot. The political message intended in the Legend of Rita is delivered directly through Rita's speech in front of a group of workers after the wall came down. She believes that East Germany is a place everyone is equal; People will not be fired or kicked out of their apartments, the socialism in East Germany was a great attempt and a revolution, it is supposed to be a world that is not ruled by money and people should have faith in their political system. Her speech incorporates the social and economic issues in the former East Germany post-reunification. Many people, who worked within the socialist system, lost their jobs as the system collapsed. Rita is portrayed as the personification of the political ideal she holds. During nearly decades between the early 1970s and 1989, Rita did not age at all, thus it can be interpreted she is more an epitome of socialist ideals rather than a real human being. Rita is also a more devout socialist than any local East German in the film. She is rewarded “für vorbildliche sozialistische Arbeit” (for exemplary socialist work), and she is disappointed that the East Germans do not understand the political concept of the GDR (Moeller and Lellis 2012). Pessimism toward reunification is expressed in the Legend of Rita, as reunification marks the end of utopia. If Rita represents her political ideals, the death of Rita at the end of the film symbolizes the end of the political ideal. From the German title of the film, die Stille nach dem Schuss (the silence after the shot), this message is implied, yet it is lost in the English translation. After the reunification, the two German states became one, and Rita’s real identity is exposed. She is then wanted on both sides of the disappearing border. With the retort of the German national anthem, Tatjana is brutally pushed against the wall by a group of policemen when she is trying to find Susanne (Rita’s first alias). The authority and brutal law enforcement still exist although the Stasi is disbanded as former East Germany being absorbed by the West. The film ends with Rita being killed when she was trying to ride across the border as the retort of the German anthem plays again. As opposed to the Legend of Rita, Barbara is almost apolitical. The former GDR is set as the background of the love story of Barbara. The absence of political manifestation makes room for the multidimensionality of characters in Barbara and a different experience of the history of GDR. Debbie Pinfold states that Petzold breaks down the perpetrator v. victim binary in which the GDR is remembered by the public. This binary mindset is an account for the success of the Lives of the Others, in which the GDR is cleanly divided into the state as the perpetrator, represented by the Stasi officers and government officials, and the artists and people as the victim. The subtle dynamic relations of power grant the complexity of characters in Barbara. In the first scene of the film, Barbara comes to work by bus. Although she arrives early, she sits in front of the clinic to smoke a cigarette and would not enter the workplace. Andre and the Stasi officer, Schütz, watch her from the window on the second floor. The position of the characters indicates the power relations at this moment. Barbara is a new doctor in the village who has been recently demoted from the most prominent hospital in Berlin and she is in a new place where she knows no one. Barbara is placed in a relatively powerless position in this scene when she is watched unawares by Andre, a doctor who has already integrated into the village and is supposedly collaborating with Stasi, and a Stasi office, who represent state authority and power over people (Pinfold 2014). Barbara’s vulnerability is exhibited in the scenes, which show she is visited by the Stasi officer. She is visited twice in her apartment throughout the film. The process of the visits includes not only questioning and going through her belongings but also cavity search. She is thoroughly searched when she comes home late and after Stella escapes from the Torgau Juvenile Workhouse. According to the time when the Stasi officers come to Barbara’s place, then the time she comes home and her relationship with Stella is watched and reported to the Stasi by the superintendent at her apartment and Andre or other colleagues. Barbara is forced to stand against the wall in her own home while Schütz sits amidst Barbara’s clothes on the floor and other Stasi agents carry on their search and investigation. Barbara’s vulnerability peaks during the second visit of the Stasi agents. When she hears the agent who conducts cavity search knocking on the door, Schütz asks her to open the door without any emotion, she begs Schütz in a shivering voice, yet Schütz remains emotionless and the cavity search carries on subsequently. However, the relation of power reverses in the film when Barbara goes to Schütz’s to look for Andre, while he attends Schütz’s sick wife in bed. Barbara comes in uninvited when Schütz sits vulnerably in the room. His vulnerability is exposed to Barbara, the woman whom he once inflicted terror upon when he is being watched by Barbara emotionlessly from a distance. Hauptmann Gerd Wiesler in the Lives of the Others works with mechanical efficiency. His function as an agent of oppression is enforced through the presentation of the absence of a personal life. Unlike Wiesler, the character of Schütz is enriched with a family life besides his profession as a Stasi agent. Schütz carries both occupations as a man, who is capable of love and feelings, and a functional Stasi agent when he carries on missions at Barbara’s apartment. Furthermore, cultural reference is used in Barbara to recreate a relatively more authentic experience of GDR and enrich the characters in Barbara with complexity. I Andre in Barbara is an admirer of art. He attempts to connect with Barbara by discussing Rembrandt’s Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicholaes Tulp. He also enjoys literature and music. When Barbara comes to his apartment, he has photographs and paintings of different styles hanging on his wall, and a piano standing in the living room. Instead, the Lives of the Others presents GDR as a cultural wasteland where the only artworks allowed are those that praise the regime (Fisher 2013). The Legend of Rita has a conclusively pessimistic ending as the protagonist, who is the personification of socialist ideals, is shot dead at the end of the film with two lines of text appearing on the screen: “Alles ist so gewesen. Nichts war genau so.” (This is how everything was, more or less). Unlike the Legend of Rita, Barbara has an open ending and it raises more questions than it answered. The film ends with Barbara returning to the hospital breathing heavily after sending Stella off to Denmark. There is no dialogue between Barbara and Andre in the hospital. Many questions are left to the audience, such as how will the relationship between Andre and Barbara develop after she missed Mario’s operation and is suspected of assisting a fugitive from the Torgau Juvenile Workhouse escape the country. In conclusion, both the Legend of Rita and Barbara challenge the public narratives of the history of the former GDR set up and reinforced by the Lives of the Others with different approaches. The Legend of Rita arouses sympathy for the protagonist and the end of the political ideals that Rita upholds. The film challenges the common image of GDR as a political failure and presents the ideals as brave and revolutionary. Barbara, on the other hand, focuses on the complexity of East German society other than politics. The film reconstructs the GDR in colour and warmth with elaborated complexity of characters and enriching cultural references. It does not only challenge the familiar narrative of the GDR history as simply Stasiland but also avoids the conventional discourse of GDR as an extinct political system and recreates the individuality of the memories of professional and personal lives in former East Germany with the foregrounding of Barbara’s love story. And through Barbara’s narrative, the people who once lived in GDR are more than a collective object to the oppression of Stasi in history, but a group of individuals who have their very own stories.

 2 ) 《芭芭拉》的德国想象和生命故事

《芭芭拉》挑战了一个屡见不鲜的叙事:innocent people crushed by the system.这里你看不到东德有坏人,天天监视女主的“坏人”其实有个重病妻子。而女主对西德的眷恋,与对自由和爱的想象混合在一起,在见到那个为了逃离而出卖身体交易的女孩时又动摇了。

上述叙事是西德东德为背景的片里最常见的一种。它极为流行。以至于我写这篇影评的起源是是德国朋友(一个社会学博士)抱怨“i didn't like that much that her constant motivation was just "GDR bad, i want out".. like, what was that based on?”《芭芭拉》用沉默和暧昧不清制造出延异,来挑战这个叙事。——被下放的芭芭拉拥有动机,而未曾有过选择机会的同事们没有动机,在重重动机下我们的选择是出于自主,还是出于逃离?当电影在这个问题上踌躇不前时,其实已经跳开了那个以个体故事来象征社会危机和提出解决方案的想象方式,而进入对生命的想象——在窸窸窣窣穿过森林的一趟趟路途中,芭芭拉的逃离沦为泡影,但好像这才是生活的样子:总归活着,这么活着或那么活着,主动选择或被推着选择。

但这个挑战依然是暧昧的。德国人又抱怨:stella's character was also kinda kitschy; if she was as innocent/pure/peaceful as portrayed in the movie i doubt she'd have ended in that correction facility.

——诚然。最后女主的选择是被一个不可抗外力推动。而不可抗外力则是东德的罪恶。这个暧昧的回归,我目前还不得其解。

 3 ) 不同以往的与“制度”有关的电影

女医生芭芭拉从东德首都医院被流放到乡村小医院,但即使这样,她仍在计划偷渡西德……
这是一部不同以往的与“制度”有关的电影,德国出品。大多此类影片,对制度本身和其引发的“事件”以及迫害的残酷性都会以极其写实的手法来描述,这种视觉上的直接与震撼会大大加深观者的心理认同感。而本片却反其道而行,采用相当内敛的表述方式,甚至对某些“可渲染的”“残酷”镜头有意避回,对制度、事件、戏剧化冲突、感情的变化等都作了相对非直接化的“静态”处理。这里,压制了一切表面化的张力,使认知有了一个更加冷静的抽象化的延展空间,同时,把“变化”控制在一个极小的空间范围内,使得这个空间的密度极大,这样,压抑的情绪变得更加凝重的同时也充满危险。

 4 ) 我们能否抛开情感而活

德语区近年来以每年一到两部的速率出着佳片。这话看起来挺悲哀的,但其实是个相当了不起的成就。这一部在柏林拿走了最佳导演银熊奖的《芭芭拉》就是一部难得的好作品。

故事发生在80年代前东德波罗的海海岸上的某个小城里。东德那种特殊的社会形式和人民的生活状态一直以来都是德国文艺作品的兴趣点。但与其他作品里政治因素所处的位置不同,《芭芭拉》仅仅把它铺在背景层上。观众在电影中首要看到的,是两个人之间的故事。

来自柏林的芭芭拉是一位技术精湛的儿科医生,影片用了几个细节就勾勒出她的品味:她听的古典音乐、她弹的钢琴、她的梳妆打扮。她把自己与其他同事“孤立”出来,其中也包括诊所的主治大夫安德烈。

后来我们慢慢发现了芭芭拉身后的秘密,也逐渐了解了安德烈相似的经历。于是我们问自己:这两个人是一种什么关系?

沿着二人关系这条线索,电影一步步的展开和发展着。其中,两次对病人的治疗是尤为重要的情节。两次的患者分别是被强制劳作的少女斯黛拉和为情自杀的少年马里奥。如果说对斯黛拉细致和用心的照顾让人看到芭芭拉冰冷的外壳下面有着感情和责任心的话,那么马里奥这一情节对于主题的呈示就更显关键。芭芭拉发现,看上去恢复良好的马里奥其实有着重大隐患:他的情感不见了。他可以记忆起来每一餐吃掉了什么,却对女朋友的情绪无动于衷。于是芭芭拉建议安德烈进行手术,并且解释道:

“您看,我是不是也得去做个手术?”

已经再清楚不过了。影片的高潮部分,斯黛拉再度出场,一切便水到渠成:马里奥的手术顺利进行,而芭芭拉也通过对斯黛拉的拯救救活了自己的情感。

这场拯救的完成者是芭芭拉自己,而不是她那个秘密的西德情人。这个情人在电影里出场两回,而他的作用并不是提供感情的慰藉,而仅仅作为西德的象征存在着。一切都表明,他作为西德只为芭芭拉提供了出走的动机,除此以外他能做的实在寥寥。那个出现在偷情宾馆的女孩警示着芭芭拉:这种关系是否仅仅建立于性、物质乃至一个飘渺的想象之上。

安德烈书里那个老医生的故事则更加明了地点明的这一点:这是一种不对等的关系,你们只是在各取所需,你苦难中抓住的稻草并不能长久。完全没错,西德很可能意味着放弃热爱的事业甚至尊严。

我们不禁要问:西德到底意味着什么?东德的生活是否就糟糕到那样?

随着芭芭拉乘坐的火车,我们看到田间劳作的女孩们淳朴而热情地挥手;我们也看到那个帮忙给芭芭拉转交钱的姑娘把腿举高来预防静脉曲张。就连那个招人讨厌的监视部门领导,家里也有一个重病患要照顾,他也会被做丈夫的责任压得喘不过气来。因此,所有人不过都要过日子罢了。

在安德烈的实验室里挂着一幅油画。它的意义安德烈也已经明白地展示给我们了:无论是怎样一个环境、无论是什么样的情节,我们应该首要关注不是事件的意义,而是这其中独立的人。他也许是时代的受害者,然而他也要生活。

必须要说,《芭芭拉》是一部相当学院派的作品,这体现在它精打细琢的剧本上。带有设计感的外部力量精确的出现在每一个细微转折点处,迫使芭芭拉认真思索自己所处的位置。这种很经典的构建是百试不爽的。在男女主的关系发展主线上,那些小细节起到了决定作用。一个出色的例子是芭芭拉两次搭乘安德烈的车,前一次总由安德烈挑起话头,后一次则基本是芭芭拉在发问,二者的关系转变可见一斑。而电影的导演则用低调、沉稳然而韵味深长的手法把这个故事讲得从容不迫,却又让人满口余香。

影片的结尾一幕可谓画龙点睛一笔,而这一场戏正是男女主演在电影里完美表演的一个缩影,那样两个眼神里包含了多少不可言说的意味。这样精妙的表演和精巧的剧本以及精准的指导一起让我们静静打量:我们究竟该如何活着。

 5 ) 我以为我会选择西德

回到家甩了鞋窝在沙发里看电影,习惯了几个人一起共度时光就会变得讨厌独处,但也许也是其它原因。一个人的时候我基本不会挑电影类型,打开一个就看,从不先查它会讲个什么故事,大概有时觉得会有意外之喜,有时也只希望忘记自己一个人或者是更加沉入自己的世界。
这部电影按常理对我来说也是闷片吧,虽然相比《广岛之恋》已经好太多,很奇怪的我居然就这么沉进去了,很少的演员,没有嘈杂喧嚣,故事讲得也很好。开始的时候我理所当然的觉得东德警察太变态,邻居女人太冷酷,住的地方太偏远……
女主角高挑优雅,与这个地方格格不入,不肯多花一分钟上班,不和同事交谈,生硬对待男主角的热情,我有时很希望自己是这样的一个女人,可惜我话多如水,时常犯二。她从没想过要在这个地方久留,她要逃往的地方看起来自由很多,还有一个亲爱的情人,冷傲的女医生在和情人见面时,就变成了另外一个人了,其实她本质就是这样的,善良温暖:安慰得了脑膜炎的年轻姑娘,呵护为情自杀的男孩,她所有的冷漠独立也是自己的一道围墙而已。
男主角有些壮实,宽宽肩膀浓密络腮胡,脸上总是温柔笑容,他看起来像一头忠实的熊,他载她回家,对她倾诉过往,想和她一起所以也弄了一辆自行车,他邀她回家,为她煮蔬菜杂烩,我看到了他的家:可爱的小沙发,很多的书,原木的餐桌和椅子,他在厨房里切着蔬菜给她讲着小说里的故事,外面可能夕阳正好。
我闭上眼,想着他们穿过的安静的林间小路,想着田野里会开的各种野花,想着小铁轨和空荡荡的小火车,想着翻过山坡就能到达的海,想着夕阳的光照在屋顶,家里有个爱你的为你下厨的男人。
我以为我会为了更自由选择西德,可后来我发现我宁愿留在这里。当然这是我,不是那位女医生,她留下来的原因,可能都写在最后镜头的那个眼神里了。

 6 ) 《芭芭拉》

克利斯蒂安·佩措尔德 Christian Petzold还是在拍自己那点东西,之前真没觉得什么,但一直坚持并保持着良好品质,加上御用尼娜·霍斯 Nina Hoss使得作品形成某种形象体系,也就变成某种厚重。从女演员到导演,柏林迟早会给他个金熊的。

影片相较作者之前,更加重了人文方面的切入点,从这次人物角色设置到医学、心理再到伦勃朗的画、马克吐温的小说。这一次最大的惊喜来源于隐藏性叙事,虽然还是淡如静水深流般,不过逐步揭示的女主人公境遇不仅形成了某种悬念性,且影片力图展现的一种消极困境、自我封闭其实不光适合于政治性层面,不过最终还是人对存在感和价值性的寻找占了上风。

 短评

想找个片子解闷来着,结果更闷了。

9分钟前
  • 普莉恩皮察雅
  • 还行

想念[四月三周两天],不过这片其实有点温馨

10分钟前
  • bayer04
  • 推荐

有些导演太会叙事了,每一秒都没有脱离这件事。

11分钟前
  • Morning
  • 推荐

审视1980年德意志民主共和国的女医生芭芭拉。关于她的生存状况,存在意义与价值观,脉络清晰地反映着当时那个世界的种种偏离。色彩绚丽的镜头后面却是极其冷静而思辨性的探讨,也许直观所感觉到的是强烈的冷漠,可不知在其后面却有很多淡淡的忧伤,爱与期待!PS:反法西斯防卫墙的自由祭奠!

12分钟前
  • L.L
  • 力荐

清冷凄美平静下的暗潮涌动~

13分钟前
  • 黑樱桃摩卡
  • 还行

舍己所欲,施之于人。冷漠的脸,滚烫的心。

18分钟前
  • 芦哲峰
  • 推荐

美服化道无可挑剔,对东德小镇气氛把握得也很精准,但是剧本真是让人呵呵呵。我就是不能理解女主的献身精神,虽然剧本说,这源自1)自己监狱生活,2)Stella在集中营怀孕,很可怜3)女主爱上了男主。但是还是呵呵呵。高贵冷艳了90分钟最后崩盘就是这样。

20分钟前
  • 胤祥
  • 推荐

三星半,其实是一部爱情电影,高压和贫穷的这边有温情脉脉的点滴,富饶和自由的那边有幸福幻想的憧憬,最终良善让她让出了希望的大海,透过伦勃朗的画,看到别人看不到的东西:不是《为爱出走》,而是《为爱停留》。一切皆好,唯独有点淡,恰是这点淡,又让人回味。

25分钟前
  • LORENZO 洛伦佐
  • 推荐

政治电影最没意思了。我们要反思的是人性,而不是体制。那个西德幻影的实际存在到底是什么,我想每一个生活在今天的人都可以体会,而叙事,却故意在回避。与其挞伐一段历史,不如通过历史反思我们的今天。

30分钟前
  • 愉快周日
  • 还行

好片。导演讲了一个好故事。极简单、白描的手法。要静静地去看,才能发现在平淡叙述下蕴藏的情绪转变。最后哭了,为结局加一分。伦勃朗的画、肖邦的夜曲,卡夫卡的《乡村医生》。没拿历史背景说事,仍然是一个非常时期的爱情。

34分钟前
  • 把噗
  • 推荐

叙事风格,静水,流深。入戏比较慢,越看下去却越有张力和温暖,冷漠至心动至留下,一股力量缓缓流溢,当收尾一对火辣会意的眼神对视,为他们心生憧憬,我相信他们之间肯定会相爱会一直下去的。遗憾,女主身材虽优美可冷峻的面孔有点似鼠脸呐。

38分钟前
  • 许多多
  • 还行

如果我们暂时抵抗不了邪恶,让我们努力把善良留下来。

39分钟前
  • 哪吒男
  • 推荐

影片里最美不过田野里萧飒的风声和摇晃的树木。还有那一看就冷入骨髓的海水。看到结尾芭芭拉和安德鲁对视的眼神,好像突然又不懂影片想要表达的是什么了,却突然想起高中政治老师每次说电影结局时都会说“其实每个人的结局都是死亡啊。”看到豆友说是为爱停留,真的是因为爱吗?恐怕说不准吧。

40分钟前
  • 凉水
  • 推荐

计划出逃的芭芭拉最怕引人关注,电车上的一个眼神、窗外的一声急刹、突然造访的邻居都令她警觉。男医生偏偏不识趣,端来咖啡载她回家,钢琴调音插座短路西德香烟,连藏着秘密的木十字架都谙熟于心。他就这样令她神经紧绷,爱情却如潮水拍打生活。活在伦勃朗的画里,无视监禁的目光,爱情是解剖的手臂。

45分钟前
  • 西楼尘
  • 还行

7分。其实我更喜欢《为爱出走》这个意译的片名。导演并没有刻意去强化那个时代东德那压抑的气氛与影响,而更多是专注在爱情的渲染上。全片几乎没有音乐,让故事呈现出一种冷酷的写实感。就像寓言故事里那病入膏肓的少女所做的,女猪的确是没有”出走“,而是停留了下来,但这真是为了男猪么?

47分钟前
  • Riobluemoon
  • 还行

德国这种冷叙事,配乐都基本没用到。冷中人性的暖更是难能可贵。三星半

49分钟前
  • 桃桃林林
  • 还行

柏林电影节第三天目前为止我觉得最好看的一部啊,虽然故事并不新颖,但各个细节和技术环节都很出色,男主角又那么cute,恰到好处的小幽默和爱情戏,似乎一切都无懈可击。

54分钟前
  • 陀螺凡达可
  • 推荐

坏的时代,好人不相识,亦是知己。

55分钟前
  • 江声走
  • 推荐

三星半。极度暧昧的表意,透出一丝女权主义的味道。必须集中精神分析每一处转瞬即逝的细节才能感受到俄罗斯套娃般的情绪。继07年《耶拉》让Nina Hoss拿到最佳女主角银熊,今年Christian Petzold终于拿到了最佳导演银熊。不过这两次拿奖我都觉得差点火候。

57分钟前
  • 月球漫舞者
  • 还行

看这部电影之前最好不要被剧透,否则乐趣大减,它的叙事藏得很深,都靠各种不被轻易道明的细节,把观众一直被蒙在鼓里,最后真相大白了,虽然回头看一切故事其实挺平淡的,但那份浪漫足以弥补缺憾了。喜欢这种冷峻的故事,更迷人是电影骨子里的那份善良和悲悯之心,天朝的导演最缺的这个!★★★★

1小时前
  • 亵渎电影
  • 推荐