手机

HD

主演:孙贤周,严志媛

类型:电影地区:大陆语言:国语年份:2003

欢迎安装高清版[一起看]电影APP

 非凡

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 红牛

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 剧照

手机 剧照 NO.1手机 剧照 NO.2手机 剧照 NO.3手机 剧照 NO.4手机 剧照 NO.5手机 剧照 NO.6手机 剧照 NO.13手机 剧照 NO.14手机 剧照 NO.15手机 剧照 NO.16手机 剧照 NO.17手机 剧照 NO.18手机 剧照 NO.19手机 剧照 NO.20

 剧情介绍

手机电影免费高清在线观看全集。
2014年5月16日,在瑞草洞住宅区发生了杀人事件,高东浩(孙贤周饰)的妻子赵妍秀(严智苑饰)被发现惨死家中,而凶手一直未能落网。东浩在妻子被杀害之后生活失意,整日颓废不振难以自拔,他唯一的女儿高景林也因父亲的消沉而备受折磨。一年后的某天,因为磁场异常,东浩发现自己竟然能和一年前的妻子通电话,并且从通话中得到了拯救妻子生命的线索,而给他的时间只有一天。东浩决心一定要抓住这个改变命运的机会,为了救出妻子展开孤军奋战。杀出个黄昏带着魔术盒的男人不良家族良医第一季背水一战误嫁豪门,我的闪婚攻略人小嘴大人狼式日山城棒棒军2崩塌末日死亡之王我被迫和顶级大佬闪婚了猿猴大战机械猿猴 Ape vs. Mecha Ape生命之源2000傅爷的假孕娇妻满意不满意中年失恋日记时空恋人 动态漫性爱自修室第一季不好,那个恋爱脑黑化了星辰变第三季猫头鹰市中心中间管理录利根川倍儿喜欢你所罗门的伪证报告王爷,王妃是只猫某个勤杂工兄弟,请注意撩完就跑,宁小姐不想负责杀人者唐斩丑闻第一季一路风尘三月的狮子:前篇野生动物寻踪堕落人鱼租借女友2022僵尸校园第一季一家老小向前冲(安徽话)勇警闯天关血色湘西石头 剪刀 布2015守护者2019我的父亲我的兵激情年代1996

 长篇影评

 1 ) Cell Phone and the Cinema of Infidelity


        Cell Phone (2003) marks the culmination of the popular cultural preoccupation with infidelity. A famous TV talk show host Yan Shouyi, tries without success to maintain the delicate network of lies and concealments that allow him to have two different mistresses in addition to his estranged wife.
        The story starts in a small town where the town’s first telephone, which signifies the modernization in China, has just been installed. In a small village nearby, a young man Yan Shouyi takes a peasant woman to the town to make a phone call to her husband. About twenty years later, the middle-aged Yan Shouyi has already become a popular TV talk show host in a big city, owning a wife, a nice job, a BMW, and a mistress. His life and work would not have taken this path if he had not been equipped with a cell phone, the latest wireless communication technology. But the Cell Phone also causes the end of his marriage: his wife accidentally answers a phone call from his mistress complaining about his absence from a date.
        After getting a divorce, Yan starts a new relationship with a college teacher, Shen Xue, while still occasionally dating his old mistress, Wu Yue. On the several occasions when his double life is about to be discovered by Shen, Yan deftly covers the truth with lies. His close friend Fei Muo, a university professor and producer for his television show, is also involved in a similar love affair with a graduate student, which is soon discovered by his wife. Eventually, Yan’s infidelity is discovered by Shen who sees a digital picture of Yan and Wu making love, a picture taken by the digital camera built into Wu’s new cell phone. Not only is Yan’s relationship destroyed, his career also ends as Wu threatens to expose their relationship and takes over his position as the talk show host. At the end of the film, throwing his cell phone into fire, Yan swears that he will never again own one. Then after a dip-to-black, the film welcomes a second ending, Yan’s niece, who is also from the same village, becomes a cell phone saleswoman and comes to demonstrate the latest product to his uncle Yan. (Zhang, 135)
        Given the obvious Marxist bent of Cell Phone’s rhetoric and its fable-like narrative of the dangers of commodity fetishism, one might easily conclude the film as criticism of the effects of rapid economic transformation in urban China, and denial of male dominance. However, underneath this reading which is merely based on the resolution provided by the film, we can find both the cultural underpinning and ideological impacts of the film, whether they are conscious directorial decisions or not, are the other way around.
        The film is based on patriarchal and post-socialist assumptions in the first place. The leading character, wealthy, successful TV host Yan Shouyi, is representing the controlling patriarchal order and the ruling class. The young and charming mistress Wu Yue, on the other hand, is a sexual object and an oppressed worker reinforcing and perpetuating an exploitative capitalistic scheme. Yu Wenjuan, the pregnant wife and later the mother of Yan’s only child, is a cheap labor whose family value in undertaking housework and fostering children is totally underestimated and neglected by both the character Yan and the filmmaker Feng. Shen Xue, the successor of Yu and Wu, is a wonderful replacement of the two women, since she functions as both mistress and wife and has the highest total value. Therefore, marriage and divorce follow the rules of product exchange. The values of women as sexual commodities are estimated by their male owner, based on evaluation and grading of their sexual attractiveness and productivity among others.
        In the second place, the narration neglects and degrades women’s family values.
While there are scenes of Yan Shouyi working at the TV station and attending meeting with his colleagues, which confirms his value in production, there is hardly any scene of the women working. In addition, among the values of women, the four structures proposed by Mitchell, sexuality is emphasized against reproduction, and socialization. While there are a lot of scenes of Yan Shouyi flirting and having fun with her young and passionate mistress Wu Yue, there is hardly any scene of him and the older and less attractive wife spending time together. The cinematic representation of the reproduction process of Yan’s first wife is almost absent in the film. Having been pregnant for months, Yu Wenjuan did not inform her husband at all, and Yan is only informed several months after divorce by his ex-brother-in-law that his first wife had already given birth to their baby and needs money from him.
        Hiding behind socialization of children and the new motherhood are deeper oppressions of women. Spending a lot of time and energy nurturing the kid, the woman Yu did not get the compensation in improving her own social status; instead she lost her job in the big city after she went back to her hometown. As the value of socialization of children is often neglected by the society, this part of the plot is also omitted in the film, and is only told through Yan’s narration, serving as an obstacle that hinders and adds drama to Yan’s women pursuing career. As her value looks invisible, Yan replaces his first wife not with his mistress whose value only lies in sexuality, but with a beautiful college professor Shen Xue who seems to be a more serious and proper wife candidate, but also has the sexual disposition of a mistress.
        From Yan’s perspective, all the three women can be valued on a materialistic basis. Women become commodities, and their sexual attractiveness, job, education status are all counted in their exchange value while man is the buyer who has the right of choice because of his economic power and dominance in a patriarchal society.
        Extramarital relationship is a fatal violation of Chinese social norms and a tradition that often punishes the woman for such “immoral transgression” (Cui 181). In Cell Phone, the mistress Wu Yue, became the conflict's cause and the incarnation of immorality instead of the Male character Yan Shouyi. As an advanced prostitute, she would love to sell her body in exchange for money and power. And, ultimately, she threatens to replace Yan Shouyi as a television talk show host by using the photo she took in her cell phone. Thus, Yan Shouyi becomes the victimized character pitied by the audiences instead of the evil woman.
        The resolution of the film, Yan Shouyi’s abandoning of the cell phone, which may seem like a self-criticism, is actually a displacement and denial of the guilt and regret by reprimanding the modern technology and communication device. Cell phone becomes the scapegoat for Yan Shouyi, the hypocritical and immoral character, and therefore the patriarchal and capitalist order behind the story, which was supposedly to be criticized, is actually being extended sympathy.
        Depicted as the direct cause of all the conflicts between the protagonist and the three female characters, cell phone, the symbol of post-socialist modernity seems to be criticized. Rui concludes that Cell Phone addresses the subject through the director’s satirical take on consumerism and his exposure of the moral crises and ethical issues brought by expansion of high technology into our everyday lives (Zhang, 136). However, in the first 90 minutes of the film, a fantasy of the patriarchal and post-socialist (capitalist) utopia was already created for the male audiences: mistress as a symbol and accessory of urban success. Female audiences were also given a utilitarian fantasy integrated with the narcissistic and masochistic visual pleasure: being someone’s mistress is the shortcut to wealth and success. Thus, the film belittles the value of women, and denies women's independent existential meaning.
        In addition to the narrative constructed to propagate the attractive image of the “successful personage” that has represented the “new ideology” of contemporary China, an image that endorses a reality of growing class differences and income disparities, Feng Xiaogang adopts a lot of meta-cinematic elements in Cell Phone to offset the seriousness of his own criticism, a technique abundantly used in his early films. There are ample shots within the TV station, such as the staff operating camera, and outtakes of the TV host Yan who says his lines wrong, that remind the audiences to question the authenticity of their own movie watching experience. There is also a lot of inserting advertisements for cell phones that deconstructs the movie’s final critical stance towards post-socialist modernity. As the audiences identify and follow the male protagonist throughout the film, they highly enjoy and celebrate his material wealth and “romantic affairs” brought about by his professional success in the patriarchal and post-socialist order. In the meantime, they also accept a message that all women, whether they are educated or not, college professor or press editor, wife or mistress, are all annexed to the life of men.
        As McGrath noticed, the basic narrative structure of Cell Phone already had become so common by the end of the 1990s as to constitute a cinematic genre in itself, a genre that offers fable-like narratives of the moral dilemmas confronted by protagonists facing dramatic changes in personal economics as well as libidinal possibilities in the reform era. In such films, a man takes on one or more extramarital lovers after achieving some sort of economic success and social elevation (McGrath, 98). In many cases, a man’s ability to defy his wife is supported by both his male role and some sort of economic success. Even though these films reveal the social issues of the oppression of women, they neither provide a solution nor hold a feministic point of view that attempt to liberate women. Instead, they stand in line with the successful male protagonists, and celebrate the current patriarchal and post-socialist status quo. In a word, these films are women-concerned, but not at all feminist films.
        Supposedly a subgenre of family melodrama that aims to criticize the social immorality and educate the audiences, the actual impact of the “cinema of infidelity” is rather doubtful. An example is the sex diary scandal of Han Feng, the former senior tobacco official, which culminates the “mistress fashion” in 2010. Even more dramatic than Feng’s films, the purported diary, written in graphic detail, includes boasts that Han was enjoying sex romps with many different women while taking bribes and attending banquets. Populated by Internet users, Han’s case is just one in a million of the government officials and the privileged stratum in Mainland China.

 2 ) 《手機》不過是一部有關外遇和謊言的電影。

說穿了,馮小剛執導的《手機》不過是一部有關外遇和謊言的電影。


筆者本來設想這是一部批判新世代通訊科技-手機的故事,但只要剝下表層的營銷包裝和認清於電影裡刻意營造的有關手機的片面判詞,我們不難發覺本片就探討手機之害這一預設母題完全不夠深度而單純是一個晃子。


本片的主戲在於電視節目名嘴嚴守一如何糾纏於有了自己孩子的前妻文娟、激情外遇武月和理想妻子沈雪三個女人之間的故事。


上面的澄清旨在讓觀眾莫要錯誤對號,而並非把電影判成掛羊頭賣狗肉之流。整個故事其實都繫於手機之上,只是手機的角色並非主題卻是促進劇情的工具。電影的每個轉折,比如是嚴守一與前妻離婚、他與沈雪的最後分別以至奶奶最後過身的姍姍來遲,均得算到手機的頭上;甚至談及電影的另一原素-謊言也是緊密的連袂到手機之上,事關嚴守一於電影裡撒的每一個謊言均是有關手機的,故此,就編劇的完整統一性而言,本片確是一絕。


從上面可見,本片的故事絕不新穎甚至說成過份簡單也未嘗不可,但只要小心留意細部劇情,筆者又發現當中不乏佳句。


比如是嚴守一作為電視節目名嘴本身就是個絕妙設置,隨著劇情的發展,嚴守一主持的節目【有一說一】便正好有對應的清談主題。說謊、心裡有病這兩場便恰到好處地對嚴守一當下的處境作了輕鬆幽默的自嘲。這種以對白闡明母題的手法本來流於單純直接屬低手之作,唯配合起主角職業的預設,又反過來為這種淺白的手法提供了非常合理的解釋,故這種借力打力的編劇技巧就確是值得一讚的地方了。


其他有關嚴守一如何「處心積慮」撒謊的設計也同時是表現馮小剛幽默本色的佳句。另外相加起筆者最欣賞的中國演員-葛優精湛的演出,《手機》絕對是一部國內罕有的具通俗娛樂性的佳作。

 3 ) 隐私作古的年代

    朋友发给我一串奇怪的代码,说是在Google里搜索,可以看到全球各地的监控镜头。据朋友说,运气好的话可以看到泳装美女。我很是心动,赶紧依法而行,不过我的运气显然并不太好,没有看到比基尼少女,只看到几个在韩国小店里吃饭的大老爷们,还有在瑞士一个仓库旁撒尿的小狗。

    但是这已经足够让我兴奋的了,在别人毫不知情的状况下偷窥他们的生活,这种快感真是无可言喻。

    弗洛伊德说,每个人潜意识中都有偷窥他人的欲望。所以偷窥的历史可谓悠久。从“东邻之女窥于墙”的年代开始,从林中猎人偷窥出浴的阿尔忒弥斯开始,任何一个时代任何一个民族,都不可避免地有偷窥的现象发生。

    在中国,偷窥更是有着悠久的传统。譬如我一直怀疑,“凿壁偷光”很可能偷的是春光,当然,这已经无法考证。有据可循的是,在中国最伟大的小说《红楼梦》里,贾宝玉便因偷看到薛宝钗雪白丰腴的“膀子”,欣喜不已,浮想翩翩。辽国大臣耶律乙辛偷窥到辽道宗耶律洪基的老婆萧观音与伶人赵惟一勾搭成奸,害得皇后最终被赐死。唐明皇李隆基到儿子家串门,偷看到儿媳妇杨玉环洗澡,色心大起,进而演绎出一段惊天地泣鬼神的爱情连续剧,留下名垂千古的《长恨歌》之外,还留下了名胜古迹兼旅游圣地华清池。“在天愿为比翼鸟”的爱情故事,归根结底其实是一个偷窥的故事。

    历史上最得人心的偷窥者是一个叫“牛郎”的人,织女姐姐下凡洗澡,正巧被外出放牛的牛郎同学看到,织女姐姐被迫委身于他,进而演绎出一番令人扼腕的爱情悲剧。由于动机单纯,结局悲凉,偷窥者牛郎得到了广大人民的同情与肯定。

    时至今日,人们对于偷窥的兴趣依然未减,莎朗·斯通主演的电影《偷窥》轰动一时,在窗前放一个望远镜窥探他人私生活几乎成了时尚,美国电视剧《六人行》里,那几个都市男女就以偷窥临楼一个丑陋裸男的生活为乐。木子美披露自己性生活细节的博客引发万人齐观的壮观景象,最后竟导致网站瘫痪。最轰动的集体偷窥事件莫过于璩美凤被偷拍事件。后来璩美凤出了一本书,广告词是“你已经看过了我的身体,请看我的心”,这本书的销售量可想而知不会太好,因为很明显,大众关心的不是她的心而是她的身体。

    科技越来越昌明,网络越来越普及,在这个四处泛滥窃听器、针孔摄像头及红外透视摄影机的时代,我们的隐私保护也越来越脆弱。正如卞之琳那首叫《断章》的诗:“你站在桥上看风景,看风景人在楼上看你。”在我们津津有味地偷窥他人生活的时候,是否也有人在某个角落默默地注视着我们?我们是否如《楚门的世界》里那个男子一样,全然不觉地生活在一个被窥探的世界里?

    看看新闻:章子怡情挑霍启山,李冰冰酒店会情郎,刘嘉玲酒店遭偷拍……就连快要被人遗忘的“老艺术家”李金斗,也就这么一个不留神栽进了“针孔”摄像头的偷拍之下……我们在娱乐的同时,难道没有一种兔死狐悲的惊惶?

    电影《手机》的结尾,严守一抱着手机蹲在马桶上,仿佛抱了一个手雷,脸上满是恐惧的表情——天大地大,他竟无所遁形。而在这样一个隐私作古的年代,无所遁形的又岂止一个严守一?

 4 ) 你最近还回来么?

       直到《手机》影片结尾才恍然大悟为什么要唱那段“牛三斤,牛三斤,你的媳妇吕桂花问你最近还回来么”,想来冯小刚彼时还是厚道人,打算让观众也思考点问题,不像后来《夜宴》的时候让我无话可说。这电影看完了,肯定又有人要说“人制造了工具,却也被工具所奴役”,工具让人异化。不过我感兴趣的东西倒不在这里,的确手机让很多人穿帮了,但是只要人们有需要,更高科技的掩饰工具就能诞生。据说以后3G手机普及了,我们可以直接和对方视频了,但是同时也有人开始卖手机视频背景了。费墨说,古代举子出去应考,一出去就是几年,回来了,他说什么都是成立的。今天,交通方便了,再想说个谎多么不容易啊。曾经不止一次在公交车上听到女友去查男友的电话清单,这真是个做什么事情都会留下证据的年代。

    前些天,我一直在想,为什么古代人丈夫出去一年也就在过年那几天在家,妻子在家赡养老人抚养幼子并无问题,而今天似乎情侣之间须臾不可分离了。一旦分离日久,便会产生共同话语减少只到无话可谈。我想,是古人对爱情更纯洁到能抵抗时间与空间么?拿这个问题问身边同学老师,没有得到答案。直到今天看到这个《手机》,答案终于探的一点了。

    男子在外几年,回家说什么都是成立的,但是不可忽略,妻子在家说什么也是可以成立的。以前我们忽略这一点,总认为是有家人或者乡亲的制约,妻子不能造次。现在一想,也未必,潘金莲在丈夫在卖饼那当儿还能和西门庆谈谈情呢。所以,这种“说什么也是可以成立的”对于双方都是成立的。吕桂花问牛三斤最近还回来么,隐晦地表达希望丈夫回家。者多少有点年轻夫妇的感情在里面。而二十年后,吕桂花搬到和丈夫住一起了,不过这时候丈夫回来的第一件事儿就是出去串门。这时候,两人离的很近,但是却基本无话了。可见想见,这夫妇对爱情的要求恐怕也就是一起过日子,日子过到这份上也就谈不上是爱情导致婚姻了,也就是一个生活互助小组冠以婚姻之名了。

    于是我也明白了,为什么夫妇可以在长期分离的情况下得以维持了,因为他们对感情要求很低!当然了,本文所说的乃是平常人的感情,而不是杨过和小龙女十六年之约的那种小说感情。而现代人对于感情要求明显变高了,不会出现那种丈夫是举子妻子不识字的情况了,男女朋友对对方干什么基本是了解的,双方对对方生活的影响程度明显加强了。人们需要在一个大致相同的生活圈子里,谈双方都知道的故事。

    人们对感情忠贞的背叛却是对真感情的回归。

    这让我想起了一个故事,一个人处于迷茫中,求教于和尚,和尚拿出三根一样的蜡烛点上,问:“那一根最亮?”此人摇头不知。和尚拿出一根蜡烛放到此人眼前,问:“那一根最亮?”此人手指眼前的蜡烛。人感到最重要的,永远首先是近的,只有近了,才能认识一个事物,才能改变事物。对感情,亦是如此。

    PS:才看《手机》,惭愧

 5 ) 有病

为毛要为这一般般的片子写评论呢,因为看了半天影评,发现基本分为两种意见-------男人精神紧张感觉揭了自己的短,说危险;女人面对汹涌现实,要妥协。

对,没错儿,人性是喜新厌旧。人道主义起见,我们表压抑人性,男人要出去找人就去吧,女人要宽容,只要不怕坏家庭安定团结你就去吧。

不知道这些人为毛要结婚。可能很多人只想要个室友,如果室友离开,再找室友麻烦,一样的程序再来一次,累,那干脆就这么将就着吧。所以啊,就有了什么灰色的蓝色的红色的知己之类。

生活能不能简单点儿呢?有病就是把原本简单的弄复杂了。

爱就好好爱,不爱就死开。

 6 ) 男人,有个女人等你回家

前几年过年关的时候,总是会有原来的同学三三两两聚会在一起。有一个好朋友是个男孩,读书的时候,总是称我为兄长,不过几年,就已经为人夫了,两口子都不漂亮,也不出色。


和他的妻子吃饭的时候是坐在一起,说起外遇的话题,她和我的观点不谋而和,我们都认为如果要是碰到自己的老公有了什么,只要大家还过得去,就睁一只眼闭一只眼,因为我们都觉得,人生的路很长,我们都不能保证我们自己的思想会不会出轨。说道这个话题最后,我们还笑,只要他不是太过份,只要我们彼此都还有颜面。





事情过去了几年,我开始没往结婚上想,也有几年,电影电视里不断在讨论外遇,不过都与我无关了。如果有一样东西,你从来不会失去,大概就是因为你从来没有得到过。


今年新年前和白羽一起去看了今年的贺岁片——《手机》,老调重弹,大概总是因为这曲子还没有过时,男人女人,就算不谈婚姻,爱情里占有和背叛也是永恒的话题。





故事的一开始是从河南某家农村里平淡地诉说了乡里第一部电话开通的时候,守一的表嫂坐着守一的自行车去打电话的情景,然后,在类似秦腔一样的哭音响起,哭得我心慌,那句歌词我依稀记得是:你的媳妇叫吕桂花,吕桂花让问问你,最近你还回来吗?


当镜头拉开,全部是矿工的人头,广播在继续找人,而这些男人,都没有表情,没有说话,我还以为是一部反应民工过年的片子,我没有想到,这个故事是在说,结婚女人对自己老公的牵挂,也没有想到,这是一个从古到今一直都有的话题。女人依靠男人,企盼稳定,而男人,也想有个家,可是他们又怕约束,还有怕“视觉疲倦”。不,我说错了,他们不是怕,这只是一个事实。虽然我们都在说,爱情消失了过后,还有感情可以维持在两个人中间。但是我们自欺欺人了,还是我们只是没有找到那一份“合适”呢?





故事里的墨非(张国立)说,如果这是在古代就好了,一个人上京赶考,要好几年才回家,你回来了,你说什么就是什么。他对着严守一(葛优)说,相处了,几十年,是真的有点视觉疲倦了……


电影里,严守一是个节目主持人,他的生活在继续,他的节目也在继续,他的节目里不断地讨论着“诚实”、“心里有病”,可是他的生活仍然不可能改变这一切,拿起手机,他张口就是谎言,那谎言被丝毫也没迟疑的说出来,说得我们大家都知道他拿起手机会说什么,我们在电影院里笑,可是她的女人却笑不出来。





故事里有三个女人。


严守一的前妻于文娟,她是在家里拖地板的时候,接过了严守一情人的电话,然后在发现严守一外遇的时候,断然离婚,而在离婚后生了孩子才让严守一知道,他们离婚的时候,她怀孕了。


严守一的老师沈雪(徐帆),这是个很独立的新时代的女性,她是个认真的人,所以她有几出戏,一个是他们第一次见面的时候,她不能容忍严守一漠视她的教学,把严的手机扔进了垃圾桶。也是她的认真吧,她在下学夜不睡觉还要抓夜归的学生,也还有她为严守一代酒,这些是快乐的,后来,他们住在一起了,沈雪的地位就显得夹生了,他们不是夫妻,严的过去有一个老婆,而且是一个生了孩子的老婆,严的外面,还有一个女人,一个很漂亮很年青的女人。最后沈雪在烛台前一根根地划着了火柴,此时,她在想什么呢?是在想,男人的心理总是如此,看穿看悟了?还是在感叹其实多一事不如少一事,不需要搜他的包,不需要知道太多的秘密呢?


严守一的情人武月(范冰冰),这里忍不住要称赞她几句,虽然我觉得她演这个角色,应该有更多人不喜欢她,但她确实演得很有神采,漂亮,青春,还有疯狂。





故事的报幕很有新意,导演编辑,作词作曲,每个人都是存在《手机》电话号码薄的一个名字。是的,我们的生活在改变,男人过去出去工作,女人不会知道他身边发生的世界,广播找人,现在,通讯如此发达,你的手边有一部手机,所以她找得到你,她也不放心,她找不到你,她也不放心。


手机做得越来越好,可以录音了,可以发彩信了,可以拍摄了,是我们的生活空间受到了挤压,还是我们阴暗的心里没处可躲呢?


其实我无意讨论什么道德问题。这方面我有些冷漠。这本来就是个对错无法分得太清的世界。





只是觉得很有趣,还有几个有趣的片断。


墨非和严守一说,女人和女人站在了一起,最怕就是“结盟”呀。


但其实,男人互相为彼此掩饰,女人则互相妒忌。


里面李燕在知道自己老公有外遇后,和深雪一起去电信局查手机的通话记录,李燕没有劝慰,对话里多少有些兴灾乐祸,还有一点挑拨离间。





在这个故事里严守一的外甥女来京考试,主考官要她表演一段小品是她爸回来后干的第一件事情,结果外甥女冲门而出,再没有进来,原来她爸回来第一件事是串门。沈雪问她,你就不会编一编,他就不兴和你妈说说话?小姑娘硬着脖子说,“他们没话说。”


这个实在的小姑娘当然不会选上。


所以我们知道生活本来就改变了我们,我们已经习惯了谎言,也许也在不停地说谎。


女人是不是你不敢承受,有一天你的婚姻也是走到无话可说的地步呢?





但是我们还是在等,还是在问。


于是那首歌仍然在响起。


“你的媳妇叫吕桂花,吕桂花让问问你,最近你还回来吗?”


……


……


……

 短评

你看看冯小刚电影的现实意义,多么深重啊~里面的范爷多么威武啊~

9分钟前
  • 中雪君
  • 力荐

国产电影中有一股风气,就是痞子当道,鉴于编剧、导演的水平和格局,拍出来的净是些劈腿啊睡学生啊这种流氓才会干的事情。这部片就算其一。

11分钟前
  • 木森林
  • 还行

冯小刚的电影总能直击人心,讽刺中的现实,戏谑中的悲哀。

15分钟前
  • 遇见彩虹🌈
  • 推荐

最近因为手机2掀起轩然大波,所以又回看一下这部片子。感觉剧本还是很扎实的,确实有影射崔的意思,不怪小崔郁闷了

18分钟前
  • 世界尽头
  • 推荐

当年刚开始出现手机,人与人之间的距离限制一下子就没有了,可是靠得太近,也很容易产生矛盾。没有手机的时候无论自己干什么,也没有人来打扰而且无人知晓,可是因为手机,人与人之间架起了一种直接的联系,做过的事情也没有办法轻易摆脱了。当下更需要这一部电影的价值观,智能手机的普及、视频通话的兴盛,这些东西都把我们每个人拉得太近了,我微信设置了自动拒绝语音通话,这也被我身边的人说过很多次,有的人也说我不正常,所以有事儿能直接给我发消息可以不要一个语音通话直接甩过来吗?但是这部电影我还是感觉缺了什么,因为讲的是出轨,这本身就是一件亏心事儿,把出轨被发现的缘由安在了手机上面,我也感觉手机有点冤枉。

21分钟前
  • 高詩遠
  • 较差

《手机》的手机过时了,《手机》的故事却不会过时,人的贪婪、懦弱、背叛在科技时代只会被放大,有人把电影当喜剧看,我却觉得能当警示恒言看

22分钟前
  • Indecent time
  • 力荐

真实的讽刺了当下社会现实,我个人感觉教育意义大于故事本身!

24分钟前
  • 元宝宝
  • 还行

冯小刚很多老电影拿到今天依然很有意义

28分钟前
  • 大島
  • 推荐

弹幕说“聪明的女人闭一只眼 愚蠢的女人亲手毁掉婚姻”、“知道的越多越伤心”、“查账单的女人有病”…弹幕确实和剧情一样讽刺 请问要这样的人渣有何用 要这样畸形的爱情有何意义 送一首歌给各位渣大爷:啊人渣再见 啊人渣再见 人渣再见吧再见吧再见吧

32分钟前
  • 鹿知山
  • 推荐

电影本身拍的还可以,但是影射抹黑别人的做法的确不地道

33分钟前
  • 潇湘烟雨
  • 较差

「处心积虑证明在乎你。」这种谎言的遮羞布还真是张口就来啊。这部电影中的男性都花心,女性都悲哀。相对于“正房”们刨根问底的自寻烦恼,反倒是武月显得通透。知道自己需要什么,也知道自己得不到什么。青岛旅馆里那一滴泪来得很灵,画龙点睛,让武月成为这部电影中最鲜活的配角。

35分钟前
  • 木由
  • 推荐

片子本身可以,不评价。小时候只看到过结尾,也不知影射谁,心想是多大仇撕成这样?刚刚看完全片改变了看法,我要是崔,能把他们撕出银河系。

38分钟前
  • 晏沂
  • 还行

范姐姐最高~~~~

40分钟前
  • 崇子
  • 推荐

牛三斤,牛三斤。

41分钟前
  • 大头绿豆
  • 推荐

牛三斤 牛三斤 你的对象叫吕桂花 吕桂花叫我问问你 最近你还要回来吗

42分钟前
  • 哪吒男
  • 推荐

真的是把生活展现在舞台上,我们感情生活并不轰轰烈烈,但平凡的生活却处处是陷阱

43分钟前
  • 蓝下老婆
  • 推荐

这片把男人那点儿秘密都说出来了,戏谑之余,确实有可挖掘的东西,冯小刚最有内容的一部片子~~

47分钟前
  • 战国客
  • 力荐

最近因为崔永元的事情看了一下这部电影。就电影本身来说拍的不错,至于崔与冯的恩怨,还是支持崔。这事儿,还是冯导做的不地道在先。打交道嘛,有来有往,你不地道就别怪别人对你不好。

49分钟前
  • 五哥
  • 还行

时隔十几年依然觉得这部电影仍然具备现实意义。

51分钟前
  • 斑斑点点
  • 推荐

至今仍觉得这是冯小刚最好的片子,因为提出了时代问题,接地气,不乱甩段子卖贫嘴,当然大部分要归功于刘震云的原作。徐帆的表演风格恰好对了这个角色,后面片子都过火,跟冯导的心气儿一样。

53分钟前
  • 陈楸帆
  • 力荐