告密者2010

制片人希望能让观众受到片中那些被迫卖淫女性受到残暴对待的镜头影响，所以增加了拉亚一角，来给予这些受害人一张真实的面孔。
电影首次在多伦多放映期间，一位观众因片中的暴力镜头晕倒，大部分强奸的镜头因此遭到删减。

对此薇兹表示：
我完全理解，让人看这些东西的确太痛苦了。
真实情况还要惨烈得多。
我的意思是，第一个接触这些青年女性的人的故事中我能够告诉你的还只有这个“低调”的版本，如果你能够接受这样的内容。
不过，这不是纪录片，你不希望（在里面）毁掉谁。
你只想阐明一些事情，它的实际情况还要惨上百倍。

联合国秘书长潘基文主持了电影的一次放映，并承诺会采取措施，防止联合国工作人员参与色情人口贩卖活动。
对此波克瓦克回应：“不幸的是，恐惧已经广泛散布。纠正之路将会很复杂，并且无法速战速决。”她还表示，除波斯尼亚外，维和人员在尼日利亚、科索沃、布隆迪、塞拉利昂、刚果、利比里亚、柬埔寨、伊拉克、阿富汗、海地、哥伦比亚、几内亚和苏丹都存在侵犯人权的行径。
康达基对此表示自己打算保持乐观，希望电影的放映能够“让人们对联合国参与性交易人口贩卖及其它犯罪活动展开真正的讨论和思考。”但她也担心电影可能不会产生预期的持久影响：“我知道我们会听到很多说法，说自本片上映以来都已经采该了哪些措施，但到目前为止这些都还只是说辞。实际情况已经出现升级。

”《告密者》在院线上映后，《卫报》报道称有联合国官员试图淡化电影中描绘的事件，并且打击波斯尼亚境内人口贩卖的行动已遭中止。

戴阳国际发言人阿什利·伯克（Ashley Burke）称：

我没看过那部电影，所以无法对其内容作出评价，但是我可能告诉大家，我们联系影片发行商试图了解电影的更多信息时得知，影片不是改编自波克瓦克女士的著作，而是是受到她经历启发所做的‘虚构戏剧化呈现’。我们也没有威胁采取法律行动来要求他们不得在片中使用公司的真实名称。

很抱歉，以上是我转载的内容，我觉得这更有一定的说服力
首先，电影里出现的公司名称戴阳国际是真实存在的，并且戴阳国际也一直在参与联合国的各种事物（业务），最终联合国秘书长潘也组织观看了此片，相信会有所动作！

但.....弱肉抢食

这个片子告诉了我们，只要人的存在是为了欲望，那么当他有了权力了以后就会利用自己的权力来满足自己的欲望。
如果没有一个国家体制来制约这种权力那么必将形成有组织的犯罪集团。
光靠政策来说服大众，只是一个美丽的谎言！

Talking With Kathryn Bolkovac About Her Experience as The Whistleblower

Posted: 08/16/11 07:48 PM ET

 

After seeing (and reviewing) The Whistleblower, I contacted Kathryn Bolkovac, whose story is the basis of the movie, and interviewed her. Her answers speak for themselves, but also give such a sense of her persona, grit and determination.

FOSTER: You were faced with a situation where the people you worked with were engaged in something very shocking. Do you have any insight as to how or why they got involved with trafficking?

I really do not think there is clear cut answer for this. Everyone is an individual and is accountable to their individual behavior and potential illegal actions they committed and continue to commit in current missions. I think most people are truly just plain complicit in their thinking and tend to not get involved or look the other way to avoid any form of accountability, especially if they think that something does not directly affect them for their position. Then there is the group of people who can easily be swayed to join in on a pack mentality, who are morally and mentally weak or ignorant. When conditions are right as they have been and still are in many overseas missions around the world, or if they think they will not be caught or judged then it is easy for them to engage in illegal and corrupt behavior. They try to justify and minimize their actions. Finally, there are individuals who are just plain evil and corrupt, they see the money making potential of preying on the helpless and needy, and exploit every opportunity they can to make a buck, especially in an industry that involves sex. They are very good at dehumanizing, denial, and lying about what is going on.

FOSTER: What do you think needs to be done to address the trafficking issue? What can government do?

The trafficking issue at large is too complex to tackle with sweeping reform. There are so many different types of human trafficking each with different dynamics of funding the corruption. Obviously, many adults choose to be trafficked... or illegally transported across many borders to escape horrendous conditions in their own countries. These issues cannot be convoluted with organized criminal syndicates who are providing services to internationals all over the world, in the form of trafficking for forced prostitution. They are involved in the recruitment, abuse, desensitization, and sale of human flesh, into international missions as sex workers. This is what I want to discuss and what I think we can make a huge impact on based on my experiences as a former law enforcement officer, former UN employee, former representative of our U.S. government overseas, and as a former employee of one of the largest private government contractors in the world DynCorp.

FOSTER: What can our government do?

First, in the short term, the United States needs to take a serious look at why we are willing to allow private companies to engage in the profession of law enforcement. Government contractors are a needed and viable means to get many logistical and re-construction efforts accomplished. They are not a viable means for a protection force or as a mechanism for the use in training law enforcement officers in emerging democracies. Law enforcement is not a business. Policing is a calling. Does anyone really believe that private corporations are in this policing and operational mission business for anything but the money? We need to set an example with our own federal police selection units, perhaps via the Department of Justice as an example, why can we not recruit and most importantly train our own community police officers before we send them into these missions? My book accurately describes the pathetic training offered by the private company who sent me overseas, which I am sure was heavily subsidized with my tax dollars. It was a disgrace; none of us had even the minimum knowledge or idea of what we were supposed to be doing once we got into Bosnia.

If we are to continue to send "rent a cops " overseas with inadequate knowledge and inadequate protections from corrupt private companies, some of whom had serious questionable policing backgrounds we might want to stop and think about how this damages our reputation and our goals. The private company who fired me had free reign to treat me however they saw fit, no one was in authority to stop them. They were exempt from all U.S. government accountability and have never been held accountable for what they did to me to this day. How has this changed? It has not.

Second, get the Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (CEJA) out of committee and get it passed. It has been more than 12 years overdue. [NOTE: CEJA would allow the U.S. Justice Department to prosecute government contractors and employees for certain crimes committed overseas. It would complement the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (MEJA), which provides similar criminal jurisdiction over Department of Defense employees and contractors but does not clearly apply to U.S. contractors working overseas for other federal agencies.]

Third, make government contractors accountable for their employee actions, by putting a clause in their contracts that require them to facilitate and allow oversight of both external and internal investigations by outside government agencies, when probable cause exists that employees are suspected, or implicated in criminal offenses. They must cooperate in the facilitation of prosecutions. They can no longer just fire people, and hope the problem goes away, which automatically curtails any further investigation.

Fourth, set examples by having the means available to prosecute and convict with meaningful sentences.

FOSTER: What can individuals do?

Learn, read, report, and stop burying your heads in the sand. Many of the people involved in these crimes could be your next door neighbor.

Get local law enforcement initiatives started, and ask your police chiefs this question. What kind of training is being offered to your new recruits and officers on the streets to recognize and investigate all forms of human trafficking?

Do you think a local police chief in the hills of Northern New Mexico, or in the farming community of southern Illinois, is even going to know what we are talking about? Does the local hotel have young female Hispanics working in the housekeeping department? They do not speak English, they have no documents, does he know what wage they are being paid and in what form? Think about it. I have been in these places have you?

 FOSTER: Many of the women and girls who are trafficked are promised jobs that don't materialize. What do you think would be effective to get the word out to them so that fewer of them fall prey to these types of promises?

The only effect we can have on this is to stop the demand.

FOSTER: How did you sustain yourself?

Continued faith in our justice system, lots of hard workouts and sweat, many tears and my husband would make me a strong gin tonic with lots of lemon and ice once in a while.
 



 

 Follow Stephenie Foster on Twitter: www.twitter.com/StephenieFoster

首先这部电影在pptv的蓝光视频里，这样你们就可以容易找到。

这部电影是真人真事。

关于剧情，辗转反侧的内容，让眼睛和大脑不停的运作，本来以为是光明前的黑暗，原来是越来越琢磨不透的阴森。


然后让我们看看作为世界联合国，他们主要负责的事项, 我简单的摘要了一下 “联合国、各方案和基金以及专门机构组成“联合国系统”。作为联合国组织的大家庭，联合国执行涉及我们每个人方方面面的多种任务。这些任务既包括安全理事会为应对某一争端决定派遣维持和平行动，也包括制定航空安全和通信兼容性的标准； 既包括向自然灾害受害者迅速调运紧急用品，也包括协调对付艾滋病流行的工作；既包括帮助各国举行自由公正选举，也包括为较穷国家基础设施发展争取低息贷款提供担保。归根结底，联合国的工作是要创造一个更健康、更稳定的世界，增进我们人人享有的机会和正义（见www.unsystem.org）”


剧中的女主角就是为了完成这些事情然后去不同国家帮助他人的其中一只小蚂蚁，不出所料的是，一群男人的里边，只有2个女人在做这样的事情，没有女生愿意做这样的工作，一年的很多时间飞来飞去，每天穿着制服，当女主角问她另外的一个女同事为什么做这个，那个女孩说，因为不需要大学毕业成绩，听说还能挣很多钱。

电影是讲人口贩卖的，一个多少年来一直存在的问题，看到影片中那些年轻的女孩被泯灭人性的欺凌，手无寸铁的她们让我揪心，她一个联合国中的一个小蚂蚁，想要拯救这些女孩们，重重的阻碍，不光使她丢掉了工作，还造成了其中一个女孩子的死亡。女人在那里，或者说在很多地方是不被看重的，丈夫的打虐，其他男人的不尊重，等等。

现在我的心情还是久久不能平静，无法平静下来不光是看到一部真人真事的电影，而且在电影最后 这个女人最后也没有能回到联合国上班，为什么一个人只是想伸张正义，努力的用自己的真心去工作，却那样难？

她一直没有哭，直到她看着其中被拐卖一个女孩，她伸出手对那个女孩说“ 别怕，你就只要说你想离开，你是安全的。” 她不停的说，泪也不停的落下来。女孩最后哭着说“no“ 她颤抖着躲到了那个连狗都不会住的房间里。

到底真相是什么，电影为我们留下了问号。




看到这些，我们应该做什么？




最后是一些电影的台词。
"We say in this nation that we are looking for people with honesty, integrity, drive and dedication, and then when we find such people, we take them out and whip them." -anonymous whistleblower


“You may have to fight a battle more than once to win it.” -Margaret Thatcher

"Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something." -Pancho Villa

"We hold our heads high, despite the price we have paid, because freedom is priceless." -Lech Walesa

   假设有这样的一个系统，有生命，且环环相扣。它的外部就像一个巨大的玻璃罩，或者大气层一样，它的运作靠着最基本的生命物体活动来维持，这是我们的群体，区域，国家，社会运作的单程模式。人类的部分活动可以提供这个玻璃罩运行所要的供养，然后它提供给我们保护、维持社会运作，提供发展所要的环境、平台和机会。这样而来即为一个相互依存的关系。同时，它是我们应需而创造的，有生命的机制，运行的体制。
  像人类的活动，能动性导致这种活动必然的结果是进步的，推动历史前进的，但是，这个过程所吞噬的旧事物，会产生消极的，类似社会，道德和法律在倒退现象。像一个个体的人，要生存，然后要成长，就要进食，然后是消化，最后排泄。
  所以。。。我想说的，一切都是必然，都是必须，都是不可避免，无可奈何的。对于时代来说，对于整个我们赖以生存的系统来说，对于个体力量来讲，谁都不能拆除掉自己的免疫系统，我们无能为力。

你认为世间存在正义，公正么？

人与人最大的共通之处是什么？empathy. 当一个人痛苦，难过，挣扎，崩溃，愤怒，快乐的时候，另一个人是不是可以身临其境的感受到他人的感觉．人与人之间最大的联系，在我看来，不是种族，国家，文化，和其他背景，而是这种empathized feeling. 如果没有这种感觉，难以想象人类的未来可以有任何希望．

看一下human trafficking的数据吧

An estimated 2.5 million people are in forced labour (including sexual exploitation) at any given time as a result of trafficking.　1.4 million – 56% - are in Asia and the Pacific.

The majority of trafficking victims are between 18 and 24 years of age

95% of victims experienced physical or sexual violence during trafficking (based on data from selected European countries)

43% of victims are used for forced commercial sexual exploitation, of whom 98 per cent are women and girls．32% of victims are used for forced economic exploitation, of whom 56 per cent are women and girls

In 2006 there were only 5,808 prosecutions and 3,160 convictions throughout the world
This means that for every 800 people trafficked, only one person was convicted in 2006.

大约2000年，一个美国的女警察被派往波斯尼亚执行联合国维和任务．期间他发现当地有各种色情场所里的年轻妓女都是从西欧各国贩卖来的，有的是拐卖，有的是哄骗，有的是无家可归者，有de 是因为战乱离家者．当地警察，政府，联合国维和组织，美国政府的contractor都参与到这个流水线式的犯罪行为中．就在她搜查证据的时候，他的调查被美国政府高层正式禁止了．原因就是U.S contractor以每年几十亿的合同为代价逼迫美国政府施压，干预调查．在乌克兰，罗马尼亚，捷克，白俄罗斯，波斯尼亚等等西欧国家中，这些年轻的女孩以各种手段被卖往欧洲美洲其他国家．贩卖者每年可以从中收取百分之2000的利润．一个美国pimp可以从一个年轻妓女身上获得＄250,000的利润．在这个事件中，集团公司，美国政府，联合国，当地警察政府，都成为了human trafficking的同谋者，他们当中很多人甚至参与到买卖妇女的交易当中．其中一个年轻女孩被人从乌克兰拐卖到波斯尼亚，因为答应为这个女警察出庭作证，被当场杀害．第二天，一群冷酷的波斯尼亚警察在荒郊野外围着这么一个被发现的年轻尸体，抽着香烟，若无其事的闲聊着，象看死老鼠一样，悠闲的看着眼前这个美丽生命的驱壳．很多的年轻女孩都是这样，先被侮辱，轮奸，性虐待，摧毁她们的精神意志，然后成为赚钱的性工具，最后被杀害或者被性虐待致死．

她把所有内幕在英国公布于众，没有一个当地警察和联合国官员受到应有的起诉和惩罚．所有人只是被遣散了．那些参与其中的U.S contractor依然在伊拉克和阿富汗享受巨额合同带来的利润．这个女警察现今依然没有工作．．．．．此事并没有引起媒体的轩然大波．．．

此时的我，愤怒．我喜欢这种感觉．

人与人之间如果没有empathy, 很难想象人类可以有任何希望继续下去．当看到这个女孩被一群男人侮辱，性侵扰，迫害，轮奸，杀害，你也许会感到有一些不安．当听到那些声嘶力竭的叫喊，我很难想象一个普通人竟然还可以神色安宁的喝茶吃饭！但之后呢，因为我们感到无助，没有能力做任何事情，所以我们便尽量的告诉自己，这是世界另一头的事情么？这与我们的生活不相干，于是我们只能叹气么？于是乎，世界的这一头，你在乏味平庸的生活着，另一边，千百万的年轻生命在你无法想象的环境中摧残着．每一个人和你一样有感情的人，每天在经历着地狱一样的生活，即使我们什么都不能做，也没有任何借口去无视．

集团公司和大学有一个课程或者名词，叫"business ethics". 你真的认为世间存在一种概念，叫business ethics么？business 真的有ethics么？business的目的只有一个，就是股东的利润．它所做的所有都是为了最大的增加股东的利润．ethics成为他们一个最道德化的理由，来让那些消费者觉得他们花的钱心安理得．

你觉得世间有公正和正义么？在哪里？（don't tell me its in the LAW)
这个问题很让人思考，但我不感兴趣．因为我不需要寻找公正和正义．
不管这世间有没有公正和正义，我们都不需要去寻找，因为寻找意味着我们倚靠他人和外界．这些价值需要自己去创造．这样创造出来的公正和正义是属于自己的．这样的道德律是凌驾与法律之上的．自己的道德律可以对抗全世界．

为什么human trafficking成为现今成长最快，利润最大的犯罪行为？

为什么越来越多的人成为所谓的＂现代奴隶主＂？特别是男人（在中国，平均四个男人中，就有一个参与性行为买卖）

为什么媒体对于这些真正涉及多放利益的问题，拷问伦理的重大问题置之枉然？

如果世间没有公正和正义，你会怎么办？

你走的越远，走的越久，就会发现这世间本没有价值，人也变得没有意义．而为什么人要存在？存在的理由之一就是为了创造原本没有，但之后属于自己的价值．让这些价值成为共通价值，才有希望．